![]() Then, in order to use a specific speaker, the experimental feature Allow per media element speaker device selection needs to be activated too. The groupId attribute allows associating input and output as for Chrome. When activated, calling the function enumerateDevices returns as for Chrome, the available speakers. It is not something new, but I never tried this feature in Safari. One of the other feature I would like to try is the experimental feature Allow speaker device selection. Video from Chrome and Firefox seems to be still no playable in Safari. ![]() So it seems to be still complicated as only video recorded on Safari can be played in all browsers. Note: Still not clear on the separator to use in the mimetype: ’:’ or ’=‘. Note: audioBitsPerSecond and videoBitsPerSecond were always equals to 0 in Chrome M96. Vp8, vp9, h264, avc1 opus, pcm WEBM, MASTROSKA Mimetypes are built by taking a format and a codec such as video/mp4 codecs=vp8 Info Here are the result obtained by testing 4 formats: mp4, webm, ogg, x-matroska and the following codecs: vp8, vp9, h264, h265, av1, avc1, opus, pcm, aac, mpeg, mp4a. And then to redo the test with another codec. I tried again the MediaRecorder API because this API was not easy to use when you want then to play the result in different browser.įor that test, I decided to develop a little application that takes a mimetype from a list and record a file during some seconds. Here is a list of the other points I was interested to test MediaRecorder + number jitterBufferDelay + number jitterBufferEmittedCount Regarding on the Stats API, I saw the following differences Report + cancelVideoFrameCallback() +requestVideoFrameCallback() This is a comparison between the previous STP136 and this release. I generated my WebRTC Surface API and here is the differences I noticed. Wait and see! Other API differences WebRTC API At that time of writing, it is only available in Safari as an experimental features. The HTMLModelElement element has no direct relation with WebRTC but as it is an element that can be animated and with an audio part, it can have something in common with WebRTC. The consequence if I don’t make mistake is that it will perhaps not be possible to stream a model (animation) to a remote peer. HTMLAudioElement -> HTMLMediaElement -> HTMLElement The difference between an or element and the element is that they don’t inherit from the same direct parent: Most of the methods are Promise based and didn’t resolve in my attempts. Note: I tried to use the API, but I didn’t succeed at that time to do something. This API is completed by the HTMLElement API due to the inheritance (see next paragraph). I traced the JavaScript API and here is the result AccessorĪnimationCurrentTime() animationDuration() enterFullscreen() getCamera() hasAudio() isLoopingAnimation() isMuted() isPlayingAnimation() pauseAnimation() playAnimation() setAnimationCurrentTime() setCamera() setIsLoopingAnimation() setIsMuted() I succeeded to display the usdz file and play with. ![]() Like for the element, the is able to display an image (aka poster) when the content is being loaded or when the content can’t be loaded. So by doing that, you can rotate the model and see all faces. ![]() The interactive property allows to manipulate the model without affecting the scrolling position or zoom level of the page. Here is an example that describes the structure proposal for a element. HTMLModelElement is proposed as an experimental features in Safari Tech Preview 137 and so can be used. So for Augmented Reality, there is no native element able to perform a display in respect to the CPU. As explained in a first draft, in some cases, a JavaScript library cannot render content due to security restrictions or to the limitations of the which is more dedicated to a flat two-dimensional surface in the web page. The proposal wants to provide a native manner to directly consume 3D content without having to rely on third-party libraries such as three.js. Goal is to create a new DOM element that displays 3D content using a renderer built-in to the browser. Under the Immersive Web group at W3C, we can find a new proposal called HTMLModelElement. So it is a good gift for Christmas ? HTMLModelElement I was interesting to do some tests with that version in order to see what changed in term of API and what new APIs can be interesting to learn. Only 13 days after the version 136, Apple releases a new preview of its browser. STP 137 has landed on Dec’21th just before Christmas. Time to go deeper into the new Safari Tech Preview 137 Introduction
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |